The Obama administration is putting $3 billion in info technologies contracts on hold and is examining more than $10 billion really worth of other projects as component of an overhaul of investing on such services and equipment.
White House spending budget director Peter Orszag is ordering a evaluation from the $80 billion the government spends annually on technologies to figure out regardless of whether lax oversight has led to cost overruns, delays and the implementation of obsolete systems.
“For the most part we do not get a great return on that $80 billion,” mentioned Jeffrey Zients, the government’s chief performance officer. “We require to become much better, smarter clients.”
The U.S. federal government may be the world’s largest buyer of info technology. Among the companies with contracts that will fall under the broader review are Accenture Plc, International Business Machines Corp., Oracle Corp. and SAP AG, according to Danny Werfel, the controller in the Office of Management and Spending budget. None of the businesses were singled out for special scrutiny.
The initiative is component of a larger work by President Barack Obama to pare the spending budget deficit, which is projected to become a record $1.55 trillion this year, or about 10.6 % of U.S. gross domestic product. Obama already has ordered a three- year freeze in non-defense and national security programs in his spending budget released Feb. 1 and ordered some agencies to reduce their 2012 budget requests by five %.
More With Less
“We need to do more, in effect, with much less money,” Zients mentioned. “And technology is the primary enabler of performing more with much less.”
The government lags behind the private sector in getting systems in place to reap the advantages from information technologies advances, said Vivek Kundra, Obama’s chief information officer.
Kundra cited as an example a Department of Defense effort to consolidate payroll and personnel records. The project went on for a lot more than a decade and cost $1 billion, only to become killed this year after Admiral Michael Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, known as it a “disaster.”
About $27 billion really worth of government projects are currently behind routine or over budget, Kundra said.
“This is what we’re facing in terms of some of the structural, systemic difficulties,” Kundra mentioned.
One of the most troubled projects are individuals aimed at overhauling financial and budget techniques, for example the canceled military project, which frequently face delays and excessive spending, Werfel mentioned.
Spending Halted
Spending is being immediately halted on about 30 of those projects, which represent about $3 billion in spending annually and are worth a total of $20 billion.
Additionally, Kundra will evaluation more than $10 billion in other high-risk projects and will require agencies to submit improvement plans for contracts which are behind schedule or over-budget.
Zients will lead a 120-day review of contracting policies to create rules where underperforming initiatives are canceled and projects are completed in fewer than 24 months rather than over the course of many years.
Zients mentioned he hopes the changes will allow the government to begin benefitting from productivity gains seen at numerous businesses more than the past decades.
“For one of the most part the federal federal government has not had those productivity gains,” he mentioned. “Technology has been at the center of that.”
This article can be view at: Bloomberg Business Week
No comments:
Post a Comment